Quantcast
Channel: crime Archives - The Good Men Project
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 114

Cohabitation Displacing Marriage

$
0
0

 

Updating a post from 2015.

In the last 10 years in the US, the proportion of adults under age 45 who are single (not living with a partner) has increased only about 1 point, to about 46%. Most of the 3-point drop in marriage has been replace by increasing cohabitation. Here are the trends, by age — men then women:

Here’s another way to look at it. Among those who are living with a partner, what percentage are cohabiting? The big change here is ages 22-29, where the percentage cohabiting increased by 14-19 percentage points. Both sexes combined:

Just a little update: Cohabitation displacing marriage, but not very rapidly. It remains a quiet period for changing marriage. (See this paper for my take on the declining metabolism of marriage).


Here’s the Stata code (so I can find the annoying syntax for these [by(x)] plots.)

Go get these variables from IPUMS CPS: year asecwt age sex marst popstat pecohab [people ages 20-44]

Then do this:

replace asecwt = int(asecwt100) / just so it’s integer */

gen cohab = pecohab>0
gen married = marst==1 & cohab==0
gen single = marst>1 & cohab==0

recode age (20/24=20) (25/29=25) (30/34=30) (35/44=35) , gen(agecat5)

label define ac 20 “Age 20-24”
label define ac 25 “Age 25-29”, add
label define ac 30 “Age 30-34”, add
label define ac 35 “Age 35-44”, add
label values agecat5 ac

save t, replace

/* three-cat trend */
use t, clear

keep if sex==2

collapse (mean) cohab married single [w=asecwt], by(agecat year)
lab var cohab “Cohabiting”
lab var married “Married”
lab var single “Single”

twoway scatter cohab married single year, s(none none none) c(L L L) ///
by(agecat, im(medium) cols(2) ///
title(“Partner status by age and year: USA WOMEN, 2007-2023”, size(3)) ///
legend(pos(3)) ///
note(“Civilian non-institutionalized population. PN Cohen analysis of CPS data via IPUMS.org.”, size(vsmall) span)) ///
subtitle(, span ring(1) nobexpand bc(%0) fc(none) pos(12) size(2.5)) ///
xlab(2007(4)2023, labsize(2)) xti(“”) yti(“”) ylab(0(.3).9, labsize(2) format(%2.1fc) grid gmax) ///
legend(col(1) size(2) region(ls(none) ))

/* cohab v. marriage trend */
use t, clear
keep if marst==1 | cohab==1
collapse (mean) cohab [w=asecwt], by(age year)

list, sep(0)

/* then I made the last graph in Excel */

Previously Published on familyinequality with Creative Commons License

***


Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. A $50 annual membership gives you an all access pass. You can be a part of every call, group, class and community. A $25 annual membership gives you access to one class, one Social Interest group and our online communities. A $12 annual membership gives you access to our Friday calls with the publisher, our online community.

Register New Account

Choose your subscription level

By completing this registration form, you are also agreeing to our Terms of Service which can be found here.

    Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

Photo credit: unsplash

The post Cohabitation Displacing Marriage appeared first on The Good Men Project.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 114

Trending Articles